Issue 2, February 1999: Volume 2
Reference:
http://www.esdsystems.com/newsletters/v2issue2.htm<<<=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=>>>
Sender : ESD SYSTEMS, 19 Brigham Street #9, Marlboro, MA 01752-3170
Phone : 508-485-7390
E-mail :
editor@esdsystems.comTo be removed from this mailing list, simply reply with "
UNSUBSCRIBE ESD_Newsletters" in the subject.This is a free monthly newsletter, which specializes on issues in static control in the workplace.
Need your own copy? Want to subscribe to this free Newsletter? All you or your colleague(s) need to do is simply fill out the subscription form at
http://www.esdsystems.com/?PageNo=NEWSLETTERSThis Newsletter is never sent unsolicited. To unsubscribe from this mailing, send an e-mail to ESD_Newletters@esdsystems.com and put " UNSUBSCRIBE ESD_Newsletters" in the subject.
Let us know what you think. Tell us what you would like to see in future issues. Want to contribute articles or other related information to our Newsletter? Send your comments to
editor@esdsystems.com<<<=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=>>>
IN THIS ISSUE:
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
<<<=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=>>>
ESDA’s RTP for 5/19/99
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The ESD Association is sponsoring a Regional Tutorial Program (RTP) on electrostatic discharge May 19, 1999 at the Doubletree Hotel—Lloyd Center in Portland, Oregon.
The tutorial is designed for persons who want to learn the basics of static control, as well as for more experienced individuals who want to focus on specific topics. The tutorial is a program designed to meet the specific educational needs and interests in the Northwestern U.S. The tutorial is specifically developed for manufacturers, contract assemblers and users of ESD sensitive electronic parts, assemblies, and equipment. It is targeted for production, design, engineering, technical, quality and reliability, failure analysis, and sales and marketing personnel.
For additional information, contact the ESD Association, 7900 Turin Road, Bldg. 3, Suite 2, Rome, NY 13440-2069. Ph: 315-339-6937, Fax: 315-339-6793. E-mail:
eosesd@aol.com.
HOT TIP of the MONTH
(Dissipative Work Surfaces)=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Work surface materials (ESD bench mats) used for controlling ESD for semiconductors and electronic devices should have resistance ranges in the dissipative range and recommended to be below 1x10^9 ohms per ESD DS20.20-1998. The bottom end of the dissipative range is 1x10^5 ohms/sq or about 1x10^4 ohms. By the ESD mat having enough resistance (or a sufficient RC time constant) will minimize the probability of an ESD event unlike conductors (metals - grounded or not) that will cause and ESD event when an adequately charged item comes into near proximity or direct contact. NOTE: The ESD Association (ESDA) has rewritten the MIL-STD-1686 standard and currently has a draft standard out, the ESD DS20.20-1998, Protection of Electrical and Electronic Parts, Assemblies and Equipment (Excluding Electrically Initiated Explosive Devices)
Nanotransistor Research
Leads to Chips with Billions of Transistors
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=
Report gleaned from Electronic Design, Feb 22, 1999, Penton Publication
Lucent Technologies’ Bell Labs in Murray Hill, NJ, has developed a p-channel MOSFET transistor with the smallest active region (known as the effective channel length) to date. Today’s state-of-the-art transistors have effective channel lengths are 5 to 6 times larger than the 20 nm regions (roughly 60 atoms) of the Bell Labs’ device.
This research can lead to chips with billions of transistors on them powered with only 1 volt.
ESD control will continue to play a large factor in keeping these devices healthy.
ESD Q&A CORNER
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The following questions and answers are selected from our FAQ WEB Page:
http://www.esdsystems.com/?PageNo=QANDAINDEX concerning Questions from Texas.Q1:
During the past few months I have been trying to change our old process of transporting our circuit boards around our factory from the use of 'CONDUCTIVE BAGS' to the use of 'DISSAPATIVE BAGS'. I have been unsuccessful due to the fact I cannot prove that this will benefit the reliability of our products.
How can it be proven 'Practically' or 'Theoretically' to justify the extra costs incurred in the use of dissipative bags? - Tony, Southampton, United Kingdom
A1
: You have a good question. There is a white paper talking about discharge times that may help. The more conductive an item is, the greater the energy density in an ESD event. By slowing the charge transfer (ESD event) down with a more resistive material (dissipative), you can minimize the risks associated with conductive ESD events. With a dissipative material, instead of an ESD event, you will have a current ‘bleeding’ or charge balance that is highly controlled.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Q2:
To measure current or calculate energy level of a discharge spark between 2 test electrodes, a high speed oscilloscope is needed (as referred to in one of your white papers titled "Discharge Times"). How high does the scope need to be set for a capacitor-stored energy level in the 100 mJ or higher range? Is 500 kHz fast enough to give accurate readings? - Abdallah, Queen Creek, AZ
A2:
The response between two metal electrodes closely approximates the Charge Device Model (CDM), which has discharge rise times less than 200 ps. To accurately see this response as an electromagnetic pulse received on a dipole antenna attached to the input of your high-speed oscilloscope, you would need at least 2 times the signal response or a 10 GHz scope.
PRODUCT UPDATES (
NEW!)=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dr. ZAP
=-=-=-=-=-=
Topic:
Discharge Times, gleaned from a paper "ESD DISCHARGE TIMES: Controlling your Discharges", January 1998, located at: http://www.esdsystems.com/whitepapers/wp_discharg.asp
I INTRODUCTION
The control of electrostatic discharge is an important aspect in the manufacturing, assembling
and repairing of devices that employ electronics. Electrostatic discharges can damage an electronic component at any stage of its production or application if not controlled. The primary method of control is to ground (or bring to the same potential) all conductors that come in contact or near proximity to the electronic device(s). These conductors include humans, tools, ESD mats, other electronic devices, boards, connectors, packaging, etc.There are other components to a good ESD Control program including, removal of unnecessary insulators, shielding, ionization, environmental controls, training, education and top down compliance. This paper will talk about controlling discharges to a grounded ESD mat on a workstation.
Of specific interest in controlling an electrostatic discharge is the time rate of the discharge. A discharge will occur much quicker in/on a conductor with a surface resistance of 102 Ohms than in a conductor with a surface resistance of 109 Ohms. How fast or slow should the controlled discharge be? Understanding the importance of discharge times will help you choose the right ESD control materials in building, maintaining, or auditing your own ESD Safe workbench(es).
The upper and lower boundaries of an ESD safe discharge rate are determined by the application and materials used. To limit the discussion, the potential energy sourced from the Human Body Model (HBM), [refer to ANSI EOS/ESD S5.1-1993], is applied into an ElectroStatic Discharge Sensitive (ESDS) work area or ESD mat.
II BODY & MOVEMENT
You should be familiar with the timing of the human body’s movements relative to handling or working near ESDS devices to have a handle on the upper limit of the controlled discharge. To reduce the likelihood of an operator discharging onto an ESDS device, they should drain any charges before bringing an ESDS device in contact with themselves or another conductor, whether floating or grounded.
Table I
Movement times (averaged) from typical operations.
|
Reaching |
Grabbing |
Lifting |
Relocation |
Landing |
|
|
Time (ms) |
455 |
153 |
231 |
924 |
247 |
|
Std. Dev. (ms) |
48 |
11 |
61 |
137 |
73 |
Table I depicts averaged times, in milliseconds for the handing of tools or devices at a workbench with a corresponding standard deviation in millseconds. The shortest time of 153 ms, or worst case, is the time that we will design our ESDS workbench table top with. You want to be sure that your device is fully discharged well before the 153 ms landing time. A good rule of thumb would be to engineer a x2 safety factor. Therefore your device should be fully discharged before reaching 76.5 ms (76.5 ms x 2 = 153 ms). The time constraint of 76.5 ms for body movement defines the upper boundary of the controlled discharge rate (not including the standard deviation of 11 ms).
III ENERGY CONSIDERATIONS
Table II
Typical Discharge times [t=R*C*ln(V/V0)] for an RC circuit
where C=200 pF and V0=249 Volts
|
R |
102 W |
2.2x103 W |
106 W |
107 W |
8.3x107 W |
108 W |
109 W |
1011 W |
|
Time |
92 ns |
2 m s |
920 m s |
9.2 ms |
76.5 ms |
92 ms |
920 ms |
92 s |
Table II shows calculated discharge rates for the human body model onto an ESD grounded mat with surface-to-ground (RTG) resistances from 102 to 1011 Ohms. The more conductive the ESD mat on the workbench is, the faster the discharge, but there is another consideration too.
How fast is too fast? When does the discharge energy at any given time reach a critical level that can damage a semiconductor? The answer depends on several variables relative to the semiconductor’s construction such as line spacing, composition, density, packaging, etceteras, all leading to an ESD component classification [refer to table I in the ANSI EOS/ESD S5.1-1993 and the manufactures’ device specifications].
For simplicity’s sake assume the worst case, class 0, which has a 0 to 249 Volt tolerance. Applying the HBM, a conservative worst case capacitance would be 200 pF, twice that of the HBM and resistance of 10K
W . Therefore the maximum power (P) level based on Ohm’s Law is P=V2/R (J/s) and the worst case HBM is ((249)2/10K)=6.2 Watts or Joules per second (Js-1).The maximum energy (E) stored in a worst case HBM capacitance (C) of 200 pF and at a maximum voltage (V) of 249 Volts, (using E=1/2 CV2), yields 6.2
m J. The next concern is to relate energy to time. The time constant (t ) is the measure of the length in time, in a natural response system, for the discharge current to die down to a negligible value (assume 1% of the original signal). For an RC circuit, the time constant (t ) is equivalent to the multiple of the equivalent resistance and capacitance. In this case, the time constant (t ) of our RC circuit is (10KW )(200pF) or t = 2 m s. Discharging this energy upon touching a conductor at zero volts yields a current, (using I=P/V), of (6.2Js-1)/(249V) or 24.8 mA. To avoid damaging a class 0 ESDS device, the discharge current must be below 24.8 mA. Engineering in a "2x" safety factor, the maximum discharge current would be 12.4 mA. To maintain a discharge current below 12.4 mA, we need to look at our grounding equipment on the ESDS workbench.Table III
Discharge currents from a 6.2
m J lossless energy source(with C=200pF & V=249V) dependent on the discharge time.
|
Current |
24,900 A |
24.9 A |
12.4 mA |
2.49 mA |
249 m A |
24.9 m A |
2.49 m A |
249 nA |
|
Time (s) |
1x10-12 |
1x10-9 |
2.01x10-6 |
1x10-5 |
1x10-4 |
1x10-3 |
1x10-2 |
1x10-1 |
The rate at which 6.2
m J of energy discharges is very important. To fast a discharge will lead to an ESD Event, which can electromagnetically be measured using a simple loop antenna attached to a high impedance input of a high-speed storage scope. The faster the discharge the greater the discharge current becomes as well as the emf (electromotive force) on the loop antenna from the EMI (ElectroMagnetic Interference). Table III depicts the discharge current for 6.2 m J at varying discharge times. We are assuming lossless conditions during the discharge for worst case. For our example, to keep the discharge current below 12.4 mA, the discharge rate [from Table III] must be no quicker than 2.01 m s. This energy-based-time constraint forms the lower boundary of the controlled discharge rate.IV MAT MATERIALS
The upper and lower boundary of our controlled discharge rate are now defined and can be used to help in choosing the correct ESD mat for an ESDS workstation. ESD mat materials come in many variations. In general, mats are either made from vinyl or rubber material and can be homogeneous or multi-layered. Rubber mats, in general, have good chemical and heat resistance but vinyl tends to be more cost effective. The electrical properties of an ESD mat are important to know in controlling the electrostatic discharge.
An ESD mat will be either electrically conductive or dissipative. Both terms mean that the mat will conduct a charge when grounded. The difference in the terms is defined by the materials resistance, which effects the speed of the discharge. By definition [ESD ADV1.0-1994] a conductive material has a surface resistivity of less than 1x105
W /sq and a dissipative material is greater than 1x105 W /sq but less than 1x1012 W /sq. Anything with a surface resistivity greater than 1x1012 W /sq is considered insulative and will essentially not conduct charges.Back to our example. If the maximum discharge current of our ESDS device is 12.4 mA, then the discharge time based on energy must be slower than 2.01
m s and based on body movement must be faster than 76.5 ms. Using the discharge times from Table II and assuming that the mat has a negligible capacitance relative to the HBM, then the mat resistance must be greater than 2.2x103 W or 2.2x104 W /sq and less than 8.3x107 W or 8.3x108 W /sq. In other words, a very conductive mat for some applications may be to quick to discharge and yield more dangerous ESD events whether properly grounded or not.The natural response of a 249 Volt discharge in an RC circuit using a capacitance of 200 pF (HBM) into resistances (mat) of 104, 105, and 106 Ohms is a decaying exponential that drops quicker for lower resistance values. The natural response of the104
W curve is below 1% of its’ initial voltage in less than 10 m s where the 106 W curve takes less than 1ms to discharge to less than 1% (V<2.49 V) of its initial value (V0=249 V).V GROUND STRAPS
Another defense, and the most common method, to reduce the risk of creating an ESD event is wearing a grounded wrist strap at the workstation. The wrist strap connects the skin (a large conductor) to a common potential (usually power ground). Properly worn, the wrist strap should fit snugly, making proper contact with the skin, to reduce contact resistance. Refer to the manufactures specifications and instructions of the wrist strap.
The wrist strap, since it is connected to ground, will quickly discharge any charge the body either generates through tribocharging or becomes exposed to through induction. Anytime the body directly touches a charged conductor, a discharge will occur because the body is at a different potential (0 Volts). Controlling this discharge is important if the conductor is an ESDS device and in minimizing induced charges through EMI onto nearby ungrounded ESDS devices.
The electrical properties of the skin of an operator can have a wide range in both resistance and capacitance depending on several variables. An operator’s hand touching a charged device will initiate a discharge at the rate of the time constant of the skin before including the RL properties of the wrist strap. To reduce the potential of an unsafe discharge from a device to a very conductive operator, adding resistance to the operator at the interface from skin to device may be necessary. Some solutions are static dissipative gloves or finger cots, which if worn properly, may add from 1 to 10 M
W to the RC circuit of the skin. This in turn slows down the discharge rate to well over 2 m s.VI CONCLUSION
The upper and lower boundaries of a safe discharge rate are determined by the application and materials used. The movements of the operator define our upper boundary and the max energy, as defined by the ESDS component classification, dictates our lower boundary. We want to design an ESDS workbench to control the discharge rate (via the circuit’s time constant) of our grounded or conductive materials within these limits.
For the HBM, and a class 0 device, the materials chosen for a safe ESD workbench should have electrical properties to support discharge rates between 2
m s and 76.5 ms. These discharge rates, using worst case assumptions, equate to an ESD mat surface with an RTG (Resistance To Groundable point) between 2.2x103 W and 8.3x107 W. This controlled discharge rate window will vary depending on the class of semiconductor components used (class 0 to class 3B) and the properties of production resources used (human vs. automated).The numbers calculated were based on assumptions used to simplify the explanation of the material. Real world applications are much more complex and require a more detailed analysis, which was beyond the scope of this paper.
<<<=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=>>>
This is a free monthly newsletter, which specializes on issues in static control in the workplace.
Need your own copy? Want to subscribe to this Newsletter? All you or your colleague(s) need to do is simply fill out the subscription form at
http://www.esdsystems.com/?PageNo=NEWSLETTERSThis Newsletter is never sent unsolicited. To unsubscribe from this mailing, simply reply to this e-mail and include in the subject field the following:
UNSUBSCRIBE ESD_NewslettersLet us know what you think. Tell us what you would like to see in future issues. Want to contribute articles or other related information to our Newsletter? Send your comments to the
editor@esdsystems.comCopyright © Desco Industries, Inc. 1999
END V2I2